Meet CybrIQ at InfoComm 2026 · Booth C5052 · June 16–19 · Las Vegas · opens in · Pre-book a working session →
Comparisons

Forescout, Armis, Asimily. Where CybrIQ fits, where it doesn’t, and when to run both.

Three honest side-by-sides written for the security and compliance leader evaluating two vendors at once. Each names where the other platform is strong, where CybrIQ is strong, and the customer-environment shape that decides between “pick one” and “run both.” If a comparison page won’t admit where it loses, leave the tab open and find one that will.

The visibility ceiling.

NAC, EDR, SIEM, and firewalls all read the network from Layer 2 up. CybrIQ adds the layer underneath: the wire itself.

CybrIQ does not replace NAC, EDR, SIEM, or firewalls. It feeds them the layer they cannot read on their own.

Comparison

CybrIQ vs Forescout.

Forescout owns enterprise NAC at scale. CybrIQ owns Layer 1 visibility for the surface NAC was not designed to see. Most large environments end up running both.

Read the comparison
Comparison

CybrIQ vs Armis.

Armis classifies devices via behavioral fingerprint. CybrIQ verifies them via switch-derived identity signature. Behavioral identification and physical-layer verification are complementary, not competing.

Read the comparison
Comparison

CybrIQ vs Asimily.

Asimily is purpose-built for medical-device security. CybrIQ covers the full hospital network, including the AV, IT, and OT surface adjacent to medical devices. Customers running both report tighter coverage on the categories that fall between.

Read the comparison

Bring the question to the working session.

If you are evaluating two vendors at once, the cleanest way to see what each one actually shows is to run them on your environment.

Patented Device DNA™SOC 2 Type II alignedNDAA 889 alignedEngineered for the AV channelInfoComm 2026 · Booth C5052