CybrIQ vs Forescout.
Forescout owns enterprise NAC at scale. CybrIQ owns Layer 1 visibility for the surface NAC was not designed to see. Most large environments end up running both.
Read the comparisonThree honest side-by-sides written for the security and compliance leader evaluating two vendors at once. Each names where the other platform is strong, where CybrIQ is strong, and the customer-environment shape that decides between “pick one” and “run both.” If a comparison page won’t admit where it loses, leave the tab open and find one that will.
NAC, EDR, SIEM, and firewalls all read the network from Layer 2 up. CybrIQ adds the layer underneath: the wire itself.
OSI layer
What the rest of the field reads
What CybrIQ reads
What lives below the ceiling
CybrIQ does not replace NAC, EDR, SIEM, or firewalls. It feeds them the layer they cannot read on their own.
Forescout owns enterprise NAC at scale. CybrIQ owns Layer 1 visibility for the surface NAC was not designed to see. Most large environments end up running both.
Read the comparisonArmis classifies devices via behavioral fingerprint. CybrIQ verifies them via switch-derived identity signature. Behavioral identification and physical-layer verification are complementary, not competing.
Read the comparisonAsimily is purpose-built for medical-device security. CybrIQ covers the full hospital network, including the AV, IT, and OT surface adjacent to medical devices. Customers running both report tighter coverage on the categories that fall between.
Read the comparisonIf you are evaluating two vendors at once, the cleanest way to see what each one actually shows is to run them on your environment.